I live in Alaska. Here, everyone carries a very large handgun for bear protection. When I lived in Boston, Mass - I once used a handgun to stop a robber from taking my neighbors wallet.
I received a comment from one individual who stated that handguns should be banned because they cause more harm than good, and are too easily concealed. This individual raises one of the most debated gun issues: After considering this I came to the conclusion that handguns should NOT be banned.
I don't believe banning handguns would better America, make America safer, or reduce the violence that seems to dominate many American cities. I also believe that any issue that pits personal rights against public safety should have both sides weighed very closing before opinions are formed.
I wish everyone would study both sides of an issue and then form an educated opinion. It is my hope that this article will explain what facts I used to reach the conclusion that handguns should not be banned.
By the way, I am in no way suggesting that the individual who commented on my previous article was not well informed. Now let me attempt to explain why I feel handguns should not be banned. In America it is estimated that there are more than million firearms, owned by over 80 million people.
Many of these firearms are handguns. How are all of these handguns to be removed from the public? If the government insists that private owners must turn in their handguns, I have no doubt that law abiding citizens would do just that, but would the people using guns to commit crimes be as willing to hand their weapons over?
One could argue that the remaining handguns could be confiscated as the criminals using them were apprehended.
How long would this take? How long should the American public go unarmed while the criminal population remained armed? In the meantime, who or how does the now unarmed public, protect itself?
The police are not responsible to protect the individuals; in fact their real charge is to investigate crime, apprehend suspects, and act as a general crime deterrent. The police are not meant to act as personal bodyguards.
For argument 's sake, let's assume that the government is very aggressive in getting all of the illegal handguns off the streets. Will the criminal element remain unarmed? My guess is no. The government has been battling the illegal drug market for years, yet drugs still pour over our borders.
Why should Americans believe that the government could prevent illegal handguns from entering America?All handguns must be banned because they are the cause (s) of many deaths amongst the people of the world today.
Gun violence result in fifty percent of today’s tragedies. Handguns causes too many deaths, the government need to make gun less accessible, and the law/law enforcement need to really. However, many others believe that guns cause more harm than they do good, and should be either banned or heavily caninariojana.com the restriction of access to guns is very debatable, it is important to remember that, for whatever reasons there are to support anti – gun laws, the Constitution promises access to guns for American citizens.
An assault weapon ban would not end all gun violence in this country and it might not significantly reduce the average 90 Americans killed by guns each day. But it would help reduce the daily mass. Oh, but we should.
I say this not to win some sort of ideological purity contest, but because banning guns urgently needs to become .
Guns are dangerous and should be banned. It's time for a complete repeal of the 2nd amendment. It will be a long and arduous process to ultimately eliminate guns from society, but it's definitely time to place a % ban on the sale of all types of firearms and ammunition. Should The Sale Of Handguns Be Banned.
Why Handguns Should Not Be Banned The first thought that comes to mind when most people think of “handguns” is death. A handgun is described as a firearm that can be held with one hand, such as a revolver or a pistol.